I did not attack you, I asserted that you request a scientific approach, then promptly ignore any documentation that states facts, or truths that go contrary to your predetermined choices, invalidating your toodler-ish, continuous request for a scientific approach. You contradict yourself, ignore facts and continue to call for a scientific approach, then, when the facts are pointed out, you suddenly want an unscientific approach, requesting that the audience support your unfounded position, when the facts are clear.
Triangular is not Ramform, and Ramform is Deltoid, in one plane, but incorporates a sinusoidal waterline, to increase efficiency of hydrodynamic flow, at the hull/air/water interface, resulting in less drag, therefore more efficiency.
Now, that having been said,
The deltoid and triangular shapes you erroneously refer to as Ramform, have their own appeal, and I agree that some variants are probably worth further investigation, and have suggested software to further examine and develop the desirable properties of such hull-forms. I would be interested in seeing how they perform in the same tests as other seagoing hull designs.