Funny thing, with all your hype for your sites, you post misrepresentations and fiction, while I document and post design concepts that are at least based on proven functioning designs, with desirable characteristics.
You suggest building on the water, but the need for a floating workspace and associated expenses is conveniently ignored.
You try to make out as an expert, but your one ‘success’ was under engineered, and damaged, resulting in seal failure and sinking of that initial success. Existing pics show evidence of poor preparation and finishing techniques, resulting in cement spalling, and the failure of the secondary cementation between the added ‘sail’ and hull, of the one semi-successful ferrocement submarine that was launched.
Perhaps you could demonstrate all these things you propose? You offer investment opportunities w/o stocks or bonds, yet promise returns.
You’ve tried to sell real estate as a proposed means to seasteading, but that scheme is a ruse to get you a commission, not get someone offshore.
You proposed ‘Nemo Dollars’ or some such, which have to be purchased from you, to generate your pocket-change.
You invite members here, to make proposals on your ‘funding’ site, then demand funds to introduce concepts to ‘investors’ that you said were already openly viewing those concepts.
You cry for ‘scientific debate’ then call for opinions, when the documentation doesn’t match your story.
Jeez, what a shyster.